tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2473166537823294555.post4572632745576077537..comments2023-11-02T06:04:23.552-04:00Comments on Back to the Drawing Board: Why Would the World Belong to Us All?Dannyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14933199894935324897noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2473166537823294555.post-26472953796212329872008-07-09T21:59:00.000-04:002008-07-09T21:59:00.000-04:00For me, it's because as far as my own self-interes...For me, it's because as far as my own self-interest, it's not worth the effort to deny tolerable use of the value of the world. There is a scale of intolerability with an associated scale of severity of the "fights", and therefore of the effort I must exert to go against maximum tolerability<BR/><BR/>I will be thinking more of your question about any possible rights to shared use of the world, even though I don't currently bother with the idea rights, only self-interestAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2473166537823294555.post-54843673688382163242008-01-06T05:22:00.000-05:002008-01-06T05:22:00.000-05:00Note to self: What about the veil of ignorance app...Note to self: What about the veil of ignorance approach? Stick with the characterization as an emergent problem, but for an account of why it's a problem at all, the veil of ignorance seems like a really good way to think about the situation. Perhaps try to distance the idea from Rawls and align closer with Harsanyi.Danny Shaharhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16781136797017833336noreply@blogger.com